Shadrach wrote:
No one who knows me would think me anything other than a huge fan of this game, so that aside I am curious to see how this shakes out:
Which hero do you find least fun to have in a game? I'll start with my own.
Omnitron-X.
I generally end up playing in larger games(lots of interest in Sentinels!) and a lot of folks like this guy, enough for me to see him turn into an unstoppable juggernaut time and time again due to the safety in numbers protecting him from from taking those requisite 5 damage in a turn to trigger his 'weakness'. Add to that the long turns that can result from extra card play, timeslip, reset, upgrade, repeat etc, and I just find him, as close to 'OP' as I'd designate any character. It's bad enough that in a five player game I will politely ask folks to pick anyone OTHER than him.(It's normally my copy so I don't think that it's unfair) In a 3 player game I'm much more open to him showing up, the lack of buffer heroes means he's more likely to come up against his weakness at least once in the game.
Which hero do you find least fun to have in a game? I'll start with my own.
Omnitron-X.
I generally end up playing in larger games(lots of interest in Sentinels!) and a lot of folks like this guy, enough for me to see him turn into an unstoppable juggernaut time and time again due to the safety in numbers protecting him from from taking those requisite 5 damage in a turn to trigger his 'weakness'. Add to that the long turns that can result from extra card play, timeslip, reset, upgrade, repeat etc, and I just find him, as close to 'OP' as I'd designate any character. It's bad enough that in a five player game I will politely ask folks to pick anyone OTHER than him.(It's normally my copy so I don't think that it's unfair) In a 3 player game I'm much more open to him showing up, the lack of buffer heroes means he's more likely to come up against his weakness at least once in the game.
I agree. His weakness hardly ever comes into effect. He just sets up so easily.