by gkizilis
Amyrin wrote:
gkizilis wrote:
Octavian wrote:
I don't think there's a point in responding. You seem to be here to argue rather than discuss anything. In that case, anyone can just re-read any of your posts to see where you stand.
I will take this opportunity to remind folks that if you see something you want to react negatively to, flag it and forget it.
Using the [INLINEIMG]http://geekdo-images.com/images/redsquarex.gif[/INLINEIMG] icon serves two functions - first, if enough users flag a post then it will be collapsed from general view. Second, flagging posts helps bring them to the attention of the forum moderators.
Thanks!
I will take this opportunity to remind folks that if you see something you want to react negatively to, flag it and forget it.
Using the [INLINEIMG]http://geekdo-images.com/images/redsquarex.gif[/INLINEIMG] icon serves two functions - first, if enough users flag a post then it will be collapsed from general view. Second, flagging posts helps bring them to the attention of the forum moderators.
Thanks!
I did say I am willing to argue about the game, as in present arguments and defend them. I was not the one that resorted to personal attacks in the first place (you can review my posts, there are all there) but I will defend myself against personal attacks and I will defend my arguments if they can be defended. Also I wouldnt think twice before retracting a comment or remark if it proved to be wrong.
You have been proven wrong on several occassions already in this thread, and I have yet to see you retract anything. For instance, you insisting, on multiple posts, that nowhere do they list difficulties for the villains. Right in the rulebook, page 9. You also keep insisting that people must fix their teams and select certain heroes against certain villains, yet people keep saying over and over that they either pick random or just pick their favourites, etc. No one but you has said that they stack their decks in such a way yet they are still able to maintain a decent win rate. So that statement is just wrong.
Anyway, you don't like the game, other people do like the game. Can't we just agree that people have different tastes? I don't see the reason to continue this argument in someone else's thread...
I would urge you to go and read the rulebook again. It says:
A) You can select ANY combination of heroes, villains and environments, as the combinations are nearly endless.
B) Look at page nine and ten for comparison between heroes and villains. Heroes are ranked for COMPLEXITY and villains for DIFFICULTY, not POWER and DIFFICULTY.
As you can see from the above your argument is plain wrong according to the manual. Nowhere in the rules does it also say it's advised to select heroes of complexity to match the villain's difficulty. My original point stands.
And for the record, I was not the one that suggested to play with specific heroes against a particular boss, it was other ppl in the thread. I merely argued that if that was the case, that would have been bad design. Even if the above was true and you had to do that to play the game, then that is not mentioned in the setup.